How to use the score

Score each factor from 0 to 2. A total can support comparison, but it should never override a serious red flag. Deception, dangerous irrelevance, prohibited content or a hidden commercial relationship should trigger manual rejection regardless of the total.

FactorStrong signalRed flagScore
Publication purposeClear audience and editorial subjectUnclear identity or unrelated topic mix0–2
Topical relevancePublication or section regularly covers the client topicDomain has no meaningful connection0–2
Article relevanceMain article topic naturally supports the destinationLink appears in an inserted or unrelated sentence0–2
Editorial identityVisible author, date, policies and contact informationNo accountable author or editorial information0–2
Content consistencyRecent pages are useful and coherentThin, duplicated or mass-produced commercial posts0–2
Visibility patternMultiple relevant pages attract discoverable readershipVisibility depends on isolated or irrelevant keywords0–2
Outbound linksVaried, reader-focused citationsRepeated exact-match commercial anchors or risky links0–2
Destination qualityTarget page provides useful, supportable informationThin sales page or unsupported claims0–2
Anchor fitBrand or descriptive anchor reads naturallyForced exact-match anchor0–2
Disclosure and attributesCommercial relationships and attributes handled transparentlyPaid relationship presented deceptively0–2
AccessibilityLive, indexable page and working target URLBlocked, redirected incorrectly or inaccessible0–2
Acquisition methodSource, PR, guest, partner or paid method documentedMethod hidden or misrepresented0–2

Suggested decision bands

  • 20–24: Strong candidate, subject to client-specific requirements.
  • 15–19: Manual review required; document weaknesses.
  • 0–14: Usually decline unless missing evidence can be verified.

Adjust thresholds by niche. Regulated finance, medical and legal campaigns may need stricter credential, claim and publication review.

Keep the evidenceRecord the publisher, live URL, target URL, date, acquisition method, score and reviewer notes. Transparent records make quality disputes easier to resolve.